Confronting Mortality

 


Plato thought that doing philosophy prepares human beings to face their own deaths. He thought that in death, the human soul would be freed from the prison of the body and apprehend the true nature of things, rather than the dim shadow reality to which embodied beings are limited. During our lives, Plato argues that it is in doing philosophy that we can get the closest to truth. By following through with philosophical inquiry we can begin to see the vague contours of things as they really are, even if their true nature ultimately remains inaccessible to us while we are living. We see Plato's views on the relationship between philosophy, death, and reality in his portrayal of the death of Socrates. Socrates is not afraid of death, indeed he welcomes it. The attitude Socrates has towards death is not straightforwardly suicidal. Rather, at least in Plato's rendering, he looks forward to death as union with truth.

I don't personally think about the relationship between death and philosophy in the way that Plato did. I don't see embodiment as a prison at all. I love my body and the capabilities it affords me for interacting with other beings and the world at large. Indeed I doubt that anything properly called "me" will exist after the decay of my body.

That said, I do believe that philosophy does have important connections to mortality. I think that one of the greatest and most important challenges that we face as human beings is to genuinely confront our own mortality before it is too late. Confronting the reality of our own death allows us the possibility of confronting our own death with grace. With eyes wide open to our own mortality, we can approach death without denial, without lying to ourselves about what is really happening. And knowing on a deep level that we will die heightens our love of life, while we have it.

Atul Gawande has written compellingly about how our collective and individual unwillingness to face our own mortality has led to a medical crisis in the United States. Ignoring our mortality, we perpetually put off the difficult work of preparing for death, for introspecting about our own priorities during the dying process, for getting our affairs in order, and for tending to our relationships with others until it is too late. Unprepared, many dying people find themselves panicking, overloaded with resource-intensive medical interventions that will not ultimately save them, and with many regrets and unfulfilled wishes. 

How can philosophy help? 

In a recent opinion piece for the New York Times, philosopher Simon Critchley endorses an ancient view: "To philosophize is to learn how to die." Critchley argues that freedom is embracing our own mortality. He suggests that the anxiety--the diffuse and unsettling feeling of the strangeness of reality--that many of us have felt in pandemic times points to a deeper fact: the fact of our mortality.

I think Critchley is definitely onto something here. Otherwise healthy people who have very little experience with death have been thrown into circumstances where they are bombarded with the very real possibility of being hospitalized on a ventilator, or worse--needing a ventilator but not being able to access one. In addition to the vivid and relentless reminder of our own mortality, and that of our loved ones, which the pandemic has furnished us, there are also lessons upon lessons about the existing structural inequities of our society--our own racism, our own disregard for the humanity of those who are not affluent, our disregard for fellow creatures and the planet as a whole. The power of the pandemic in underscoring these existing and exacerbated evils also feeds anxiety, the sense of it all being too much.

I agree with Critchley that it is vitally important that we humans face mortality, and that this responsibility is particularly evident in pandemic times. As he says, we have here an opportunity to embrace that anxiety full-on and thereby to work towards our own liberation. I do think that philosophy has a role in this. Philosophy asks us to examine our views, our lives, to question our own assumptions and to improve and refine them. If we are lying to ourselves about our own mortality, philosophy can help unearth those lies and set our views aright. Philosophers since antiquity have been struggling with this very problem--perhaps the philosophical problem. However, I disagree with Critchley about what we discover through philosophical inquiry on these issues. He says what we discover when we face up to mortality is that we are weak and wretched and that our "weakness is our strength" and "our wretchedness is our greatness." I think, upon philosophical reflection, that we find we are vulnerable and interdependent, sure. But not wretched. Human beings, mortal bodies and all, are worthy subjects of awe, just like the rest of the incredible universe we inhabit and to which we bear witness.


Comments

  1. Hi Dr. Nora, I agree with you on the point, that, morality something known only to humans, allows us to live each moment to its fullness, or at least it should. The idea of morality and the constraints of one life time encourage people to attempt to make peoples lives around them better even after they are gone. There is a really good speech on this by Admiral McRaven. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaQZFhrW0fU). Everyone has a different view on the country. The problems that are in it, the problems that are most pressing. The pandemic certainly has brought those problems into the spotlight. For me the very obvious ones are as follows. The spirit of the American people enables the country to get through anything. When government is not in the way or is an actual aide, anything can be done and quickly, such as an effective vaccine being made in record time. Now I might be getting into a little controversy with this next one. It became obvious to me during this pandemic that the first amendment is so vitally important to the American way of life. Specifically freedom of speech, and freedom of assembly. Instead of tying out the entire first amendment so I will just put a link to it and I am sure you can find the specific sections I am referring to (https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendment). I will tackle freedom of speech first. There were many shocking events that took place during the pandemic. BLM, a movement that was relatively small before the pandemic grew at an astronomical rate after events that took place in May. It was undeniably wrong what happened to Mr. Floyd, and it never should have happened. But what ensued afterwords was astonishing to me. The number of incidents of looting and rioting (non-peaceful protests!!!) that took place across the US without a single politician or person in power doing anything to address it. Heck part of a major US city (Seattle) was TAKEN OVER. All without a single politician doing anything about it. The pandemic brought out the worst in people, their actions should not and will not (by me) be justified. But one must wonder what this has to do with the philosophy that we were just asked to read. Is it possible that the idea of death made people so anxious that the only they they could do to alleviate that anxiety was to feel power? It is an interesting question to think about.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Mitch,

      It sounds to me like you are grappling with the tension between the vital importance of freedom of speech and freedom of assembly for our democracy, and the question of how to respond to civil disobedience and direct action from the perspective of the state.

      I'm not sure I understand what you mean when you say that not a single politician or person in power did anything about it. Do you mean: do anything to stop property damage occurring during some of the protests? Or do anything to address lethal racism? What sort of response do you have in mind?

      I don't think I follow you when you say that the "pandemic has brought out the worst in people". It seems like a lot of folks are being super generous and compassionate in light of the challenges 2020 has brought us and the extant societal problems that the pandemic has underscored. For instance, take a look at all of these mutual aid resources that arose in response to the pandemic in New York State: https://citizenactionny.org/mutual-aid/ It also seems to me that many individuals and organizations (including our college) are taking the opportunity presented by the resurgence in the Black Lives Matter movement to inquire into ways that racism shows up for them and to make a concerted effort to change. Have you seen this sort of work happening too?

      Delete

Post a Comment